Originally Posted by bal canavar
What a joke D.A. you complaining about the NYT alleged groveling apology.
At least NYT if true apologized. Where is the apology from your media links? the Nazi Jihadi Watch for their Blatant Lying
in reporting all they did was take down their untrue story , no apology for the slander .... or Akasya's post on the alt right champion Breitbart fake story .....
Not really the person to point the moral high ground on good journalism, as your own judgment, on the choice of media seems impaired.....
Originally Posted by Devils_Advocate
Not alleged, but actual. FYI:
"To Our Readers, From the Publisher and Executive Editor
NOV. 13, 2016
When the biggest political story of the year reached a dramatic and unexpected climax late Tuesday night, our newsroom turned on a dime and did what it has done for nearly two years — cover the 2016 election with agility and creativity.
After such an erratic and unpredictable election there are inevitable questions: Did Donald Trump’s sheer unconventionality lead us and other news outlets to underestimate his support among American voters? What forces and strains in America drove this divisive election and outcome? Most important, how will a president who remains a largely enigmatic figure actually govern when he takes office?
As we reflect on the momentous result, and the months of reporting and polling that preceded it, we aim to rededicate ourselves to the fundamental mission of Times journalism. That is to report America and the world honestly, without fear or favor, striving always to understand and reflect all political perspectives and life experiences in the stories that we bring to you. It is also to hold power to account, impartially and unflinchingly. You can rely on The New York Times to bring the same fairness, the same level of scrutiny, the same independence to our coverage of the new president and his team.[My emphasis]
We cannot deliver the independent, original journalism for which we are known without the loyalty of our readers. We want to take this opportunity, on behalf of all Times journalists, to thank you for that loyalty.
Arthur Sulzberger Jr., publisher
Dean Baquet, executive editor"
It's a pity the UK MSM haven't got the guts to issue a similar statement.
(Or actually do what they said they would do- see my last post for confirmation)
We have seen your attack on MSN and the supposed reasons we are not meant to believe them........ now where is your defense of the alternative media ?????
Supposedly we are not meant to believe the nasssty MSN. So where are A.M. guts when found out lying ................
These Nazi Alternatives can't even meet journalism standard of even checking the provenance of a story ...... So just make it up to suit its agenda ...........................
If you are all for good journalism where is your condemnation of the alternative media ? The ones you have used yourself, to reinforce your view and opinion .Now they have been found out lying.......